Showing posts with label Arafat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arafat. Show all posts

Monday, November 11, 2013

Why did it take so long to investigate Arafat's death?

Nine years to the day since the death of Palestinian leader Yassir Arafat in a Paris hospital, it seems we now know the cause – though   not the perpetrators.

The Palestinian authorities themselves, desperate to maintain some kind of dialogue, must take responsibility for the appalling delay in opening an investigation.

Last night’s Al Jazeera documentary pieced together the complex and often contradictory history of what happened after Arafat’s death and why it has taken so long to get this far.

Given his huge stature amongst Palestinians world-wide and the killing of most of long-standing comrades like Abu Jihad by the Israeli state, his death was always going to be wracked with controversy.

The exact circumstances of how and why Arafat how fell ill in his Rafah compound in the West Bank city of Ramallah in the autumn of 2004 were never clarified at the time and no autopsy was carried out.

But now we have the results of a nine-month investigation by 10 Swiss scientists from Lausanne. Their 108-page report, based on samples taken after Arafat’s body was exhumed in November 2012,  states that abnormal levels of radioactive polonium-210 were found in his pelvis, ribs, and in the dirt on his body. The report says that 18 times the normal level of polonium was found, raising the likelihood of poisoning to 83%, much to the scientists’ surprise.

British forensic scientist David Barclay believes that the Swiss results conclusively show that Arafat was poisoned. He says the levels of polonium were 36 times higher than in a normal person and were “smack in the middle” of what would constitute a fatal dose.

The announcement follows the Swiss scientists’ discovery last month, reported by The Lancet medical journal, that they had found traces of polonium in separate tests on Arafat's clothing.

Arafat had been held virtual prisoner in the compound, which was under Israeli siege, for the last three years of his life. His death has been surrounded with rumours and counter-rumours ever since. But the most shocking thing about his death are the strenuous efforts made to prevent the true circumstances from becoming known.

Most parties retrospectively admit it was a mistake not to have held an autopsy back in 2004.  But it was only the work by Al Jazeera which built up momentum, causing the French authorities to open  up a criminal investigation in 2012, and eventually obtain the Palestine National Authority’s permission to exhume the body.

It’s clear that  leading PNA members, including Arafat’s nephew Nasser al-Qudwa, PNA leader Mahmoud Abbas and security chief Tawfik Tirawi, sought to delay and undermine efforts by Arafat’s widow Suha as well as the Swiss scientists.

The PNA insisted on sending tissue samples to a Russian forensic team, which it turns out, was completely at the mercy of Russia’s foreign ministry.  Al Jazeera journalist Clayton Swisher and his cameraman were pursued and hounded by PNA security men in Rafah. Several agents rifled through the news team’s hotel room, and tailed them by car.

Al-Qudwa claimed that Palestinian leaders decided not to allow an autopsy back in 2004 as it “would have been seen as a huge betrayal by the Palestinian people”, who “were not ready for it”.  They feared disrupting negotiations with Israel – the so-called  “peace process”, and that anger over Arafat’s possible assassination could spark an “Arab spring” in Palestine.

The nine years since Arafat’s death have made matters for the Palestinians. In the West Bank, Israeli settlements have expanded to the point where a viable independent state is a non-starter.

Gaza remains under blockade. Jamal al Khodari, chairman of the Popular Committee against the Siege says the situation in the Gaza Strip is an “humanitarian catastrophe”. There is hardly any clean water and an electricity crisis. All but one border crossing have been closed by the Israel authorities.

Suha Arafat is right to say that peace negotiations with the Israelis should be halted and that the perpetrators of the crime against her husband identified. What is also increasingly clear that one state for all the citizens of Palestine and Israel remains the real solution.

Corinna Lotz
A World to Win secretary






Monday, May 20, 2013

Palestinians start campaign for one state for all citizens


Momentum for a one-state solution for Palestine is building up just as the Israeli state is destroying even a remote chance of success for any Saudi-US Arab peace plan.

Last week, Palestinians marked the 65th anniversary of the Nakba, the expulsion of over 700,000 Palestinians from their homeland in 1948. It was also the day chosen by 22 senior Palestinian figures to announce “a popular movement project for a single democratic state in historic Palestine”.

Those calling for the creation of one democratic country between the Mediterranean Sea and the river Jordan were leading members of Fatah, the movement originally led by Palestine Liberation Organisation founder Yasser Arafat.

Their document, issued after a meeting held in the town of El Bireh in the West Bank, was the result of a two-year discussion. It declared that “the racist Israeli policy of separation and segregation has made the two-state solution (based on pre-1967 borders) unrealistic”. Therefore, the most desirable option” left for the Palestinian people and the one that will allow the right of return is, they say:  

“[A] democratic state for all its citizens, which will be based on a democratic constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and will guarantee freedom and equal rights, without discrimination on the basis of ethnicity, religion, gender, skin colour, language, nationality, political opinion, social origin and place of birth.”

Professor Uri Davis, from Al Quds university’s Israel studies department, explained that the concept for such a state was still under discussion, but that he personally was in favour of one state for both Israelis and Palestinians.
The announcement came only a few days after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dedicated Route 20, a new highway connecting Jewish neighbourhoods in northern Jerusalem.

Former Israel Defence Forces leader, Shaul Arieli of the Council for Peace and Security, said the new roads undermined the prospect of the re-division of the city and the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. All peace plans put forward so far were based on a division of Jerusalem and transfer of portions of the city to a Palestinian state.

An Israeli expert on Jerusalem’s demography, Danny Seidemann, said that “the purpose of these highways is to clearly integrate the [Jewish] settlement blocs into the national highway network of Israel and thereby place East Jerusalem and the settlement blocs within Israel’s de facto borders”.

Their views were published in the liberal Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz, which notes that road could be “the nail in the coffin for plans to re-divide the capital and attach its Arab areas to a future Palestinian state”.
In other words, the road project completely scuppers the notion of a two-state solution for Israel-Palestine, which the extensive Zionist settlement programme on the West Bank had already made unviable.

The highway has been denounced by United Nations Special Rapporteur Richard Falk who is calling on the Israeli government to halt its construction immediately. He says it will ruin the livelihoods of the 9,300 Palestinian residents. 

Netanyahu’s road-building is hardly surprising considering that the Israeli Prime Minister’s aides have denounced the Arab peace plan as “trick” intended to entrap Israel.

And, as Jonathan Cook, a distinguished journalist writing for the Israeli Occupation Archive, notes, Netanyahu’s government demanded that Google should not use the word “Palestine”, claiming it was damaging the peace process.

Wikileaks has disclosed documents proving that Netanyahu is only the last of many Israeli leaders with total contempt for peace negotiations. In cables from 1975, US diplomats describe Israel as “hell-bent on self-destruction”.

The Fatah leaders’ support for a one-state solution is a crucial break from the conciliatory position taken for years by PLO president Mahmoud Abbas and Arab League negotiators who, under American pressure, conceded Palestinian territory in the hopes of a deal. A World to Win welcomes the initiative, which opens up a way forward for Palestinians and Israelis alike.

Corinna Lotz
A World to Win secretary