Showing posts with label British Gas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label British Gas. Show all posts

Friday, October 18, 2013

Heat or eat, live or die: the market will decide

Behind the rip-off increases in gas and electricity prices announced by British Gas is an industry dominated by six secretive corporations who take their cue from the international energy market to drive up profits. 

It should come as no surprise that the big six operate as an oligopoly, raising prices in unison whenever they can, but especially before the winter sets in. They decide whether people will heat or eat and, in the case of some, live or die from the cold.

While the market wholesale price for gas, for example, has risen and fallen since 2004 (see graph), the big six have ensured that the price paid by consumers has continued on its upward trend.  


Attempt to find out how the six operate and you come up against a brick wall of “commercial confidentiality”. Trying to get to the bottom of it all baffled Which?, the Consumers’ Association magazine. In its October edition it reported:

“And most of the trading they [the six] do externally just isn’t transparent – there are no details of how much electricity is sold or what prices were paid. It’s nearly impossible to find out how much your company paid for the energy it sells, and therefore impossible to work out if you’re paying a fair price as an end user.”

That’s not the end of it. Each of the major suppliers also has a power generating arm. They sell electricity to themselves. “However, this is carried out behind closed doors and the price the supply arm of the company pays to the generation arm isn’t made public.” The generation arms of these companies made average profits of about 20% in 2012.

Which? concludes that the companies are so cynical they don’t even care about losing customers as a result of price rises. In 2006, British Gas’ parent company Centrica raised prices by an astronomical 28.6%. Over 850,000 customers quit. But revenue from gas sales still rose by 15%.

You can just see British Gas executives laughing all over their faces following prime minister Cameron’s appeal yesterday for people to switch suppliers. They are not bothered in the slightest. As for them blaming the government’s “green tax” for the rise, it only accounts for 5% of your bill.

Although renewable energy now accounts for 11% of the total (even this output, by the way, is sold on the market!), Britain is still reliant on fossil fuels despite their proven connection to climate change and extreme weather patterns.

Gas and electricity prices have been rising steadily since 2004 – the year Britain first became a net importer of energy as North Sea gas and oil supplies began to fall way. Since then, first New Labour and now the ConDems have been thrashing around trying to devise an energy policy reliant on the private sector

The fact is that both the ConDems and One Nation Labour are in thrall to the corporations and the market. So we’re now faced with a market that protects profits at the expense of consumer plus the refusal of the state to create an ecologically-sustainable energy supply that breaks the dependence on fossil fuels.

Switching suppliers is, as we have seen, a bit pointless as the prices of the main suppliers are more or less in line with each other. Smaller suppliers are simply squeezed out. Labour’s idea of an 18-month price freeze sometime in 2015 is combined with a plan to “reform the market”. This is a sticking plaster approach rather than a solution.

The energy market itself is an obscenity. Fuel is a basic necessity, a social right. So no one should expect profit-driven generators and suppliers to deliver on this. Breaking dependence on the market would mean a massive switch to renewable energy generation. That will also require the return to public ownership of the energy industry.

Who is prepared to implement this solution is another question. The answer certainly lies beyond the political careerists at Westminster and a system that puts profits before people.

Paul Feldman
Communications editor

  

Wednesday, June 08, 2011

Eat or heat - the choice facing millions

As energy and food prices soar, jobs and services disappear and incomes are cut it amounts to the worst assault on living standards in living memory.

For the 2.4 million households affected, the price of gas supplied by Scottish Power will increase by 19% - almost one-fifth – on August 1, and electricity will go up by 10%. Other energy supply companies are expected to follow Scottish Power with similar increases in the wake of a 30% increase in wholesale prices since November 2010,

Annual household energy bills are expected to rise by up to £200 to £1400 this year, hitting those on low incomes hard, and British Gas is warning that wholesale prices are expected to rise a further 25% this coming winter. With food prices rises also accelerating – a typical basket has risen close to 5% in the last year - many pensioners already have to choose between eating and staying warm, and some will have to forgo both this winter.

Whilst across the world inflation is cutting into incomes and enraging millions, opinion leaders for rich investors are building the case for much worse to avoid the catastrophic consequences of having to admit bankruptcy by Greece or allowing debt default by the USA which is threatened for August 2nd.

As the inflationary US money-creation quantitative easing programme runs into the sand, having failed to bring about a recovery, Glenn Hutchins, co-founder of investment company Silver Lake, and vice-chairman of the Brookings Institution says ‘The time is long past for “rosy scenarios” which the markets won’t believe. Hard choices will have to be made.’ And these include dramatic cuts in government spending programs combined with savage tax increases.

Meanwhile, the oil-producing countries that belong to OPEC and control 40% of world supplies are meeting to consider increasing production or maintaining high prices whilst every NATO bomb that hits Tripoli keeps high-grade Libyan oil under the ground and drives world oil prices higher.

The Arab Spring uprisings has terrified autocrats in oil-producing countries – Saudi Arabia in particular. The Saudi monarchy, for example, hope they can cling remain in power by appeasing their populations with public spending programmes – and claw back the money by raising the price of their oil. Forecasters say that oil prices will not drop below $80-$100 a barrel for years to come. They could even rise to $130-$140 – with huge effects on the world economy which relies on oil for 30% of its energy needs.

And with oil the most critical commodity for capitalism after labour, the higher the price of oil goes, the lower wages and benefits - the price of labour - must fall, if profits are to be maintained.

Some are calling for energy companies to open their books to explain the need for price increases when Scottish Power, owned by Spanish company Iberdrola, made £1.3bn profit in 2009/10. Southern Energy made £2.1bn.

Norman Kerr, of the Fuel poverty charity Energy Action Scotland, says rightly that "It is time to recognise that being able to heat and power the home to an adequate level at a price that is affordable is an essential part of everyday living and we cannot continue to pile more on to fuel bills and push more people into fuel poverty."

For the majority of the world’s population there’s only one choice: to take the energy companies into social ownership and end the for-profit system once and for all.

The rising price of basic necessities – fuel in particular - is a common factor that can potentially unite ordinary people’s struggles around the world. Protecting the vast oil and oil resources in countries from the corporate raptors and their war-mongering representatives in government is vital. Bringing energy sources under the control of popular assemblies to be used in a not-for-profit way offers a way forward. Then, collectively, people’s assemblies can begin to plan safe use of oil and natural resources to meet needs and restore the planet’s ecosystem.

Gerry Gold
Economics editor