Gated intellectual community for the rich

Philosopher A.C. Grayling’s justification for setting up a super-elite academy charging students £18,000 a year is a wretched example of a thinker who can no longer tell up from down.

Grayling, who is based at London’s Birkbeck College as well as being a fellow of St Anne's College Oxford, has recruited celebrity biologist Richard Dawkins, historians Niall Ferguson and Linda Colley, psychologist Richard Pinker, and geneticist Steve Jones to teach at his new institution.

In a strange example of Orwellian double-speak, Grayling said that the decision to launch the New College for the Humanities “highlights the government’s failure to protect art and humanities and is further proof that its university funding will entrench inequality within higher education”.

Well, there is no doubt that humanities courses are being slashed at universities around the country and that this is increasing inequality. At London Metropolitan university, for example, 557 courses are being cut to around 160. As Cliff Snaith, University and College Union's London Met branch says, this “this is an elitist agenda to cut working class higher education”.

It also has a disproportionate effect on cultural subjects for black and ethnic minority students. And it’s also quite true that in addition to cuts in humanities courses, the quality of education is taking a steep dive, with huge increases in the student-teacher ratio.

If Grayling and his academic bedfellows feel so depressed about cuts to humanities courses, they could always offer to teach them for free, or start an appeal to launch a not-for-profit rival institution. Instead, non-believers like Grayling and Dawkins have found themselves a new god in Mammon.

Grayling and his ilk also intend to milk the public purse for all it is worth. As students and lecturers at Birkbeck College have said, the move to create the elite college enjoys the collusion of the University of London, a publicly-maintained and funded institution.

The furious response to the NCH project may yet derail it. Literary critic Terry Eagleton, leading academics, student and university union leaders are angrily denouncing the plan.

Some have even compared Grayling’s launch to Henry VIII’s dissolution of the monasteries which destroyed seats of learning and libraries.

Rod Edmond from the University of Kent refers to Trahison des Clercs (Treason of the Clerics) written in 1927 in which Julien Bender attacked French and German intellectuals for supporting nationalist ideologies. The Common People group has begun an on-line campaign to persuade Dawkins to consider “politely decline the invitation take up his post”.

As a private institution, New College will charge double the current £9,000 per year statutorily-capped student fees. For a whopping £54,000 three-year course students are being promised a better than 10-1 student-teacher ratio and 12-13 hours contact with teachers each week.

Grayling and his backers, who include Charles Watson, chair of the City PR firm Financial Dynamics, have raised some up to £10 million to fund the college. CEO Jeremy Gibbs’ job titles gives a flavour of things – he is also deputy chairman at Scientific Digital Imaging PLC and Director at Cambridge Venture Management.

But the move signifies more. Grayling has jumped ship from the largely state-sponsored model of education that has prevailed since the Red Brick universities were set up in the post World War II era along-side the National Health Service and the welfare state.

The marketisation of education, first under New Labour and now under the Lib-Con Coalition, included more and more reliance on the private sector plus the introduction of tuition fees. What Grayling and his supporters are saying is – the private-public partnership model has failed. They propose unashamedly a “gated intellectual community for the rich”, as one lecturer from Kingston University put it.

Grayling’s move from liberal humanist to open elitist is a loud and clear warning. The welfare state model is well and truly shattered, first by globalisation and now by spending cuts. This is the source of a deep crisis in humanist-liberal thought that Grayling and Dawkins manifest.

Corinna Lotz
A World to Win secretary

In defence of football

The dramas playing out in South Africa over the England team have concentrated the minds of millions of fans around the world. The excitement being generated, the feelings of elation and despair offer an opportunity to think about the true meaning of sport.

Philosopher and literary theorist Terry Eagleton, recently threw down a challenge to football lovers. In a provocative article, he claims that the game is “the opium of the people, not to speak of their crack cocaine”.

Whilst acknowledging the “sublime artistry” sometimes displayed in football and the way it “blends dazzling individual talent with selfless teamwork”, Eagleton says that the World Cup is worse news than the Cameron government “for those seeking radical change”. He concludes that the game should be abolished.

Of course it is true that football, like other sports, and indeed like many aspects of culture, has been integrated into the money-spinning structures of global capitalism. Locals in South Africa cannot afford to buy tickets for the World Cup, not to mention the unemployed or supporters in other parts of Africa. England fans have shelled out £600 each for tickets plus another £3,000 to make the trip to Cape Town.

But is Eagleton right to say that the ruling classes can use football to “hold back change” by reinforcing their control over the minds of the masses? Is today’s game just a case of bread and circuses as in the days of ancient Rome, when emperors held sway over the common people by providing them with food and entertainment? That would mean that all forms of sport, art and entertainment are simply pre-packaged forms of propaganda which have no intrinsic value and no liberating qualities – and that human beings can never, ever break out of the prison of capitalist relations.

In reality the history of sport is one of open, unexpected moments - including some thrilling political events. Athletes Tommie Smith and John Carlos’ “Power to the People” salute at the Mexican Olympics in 1968 before global audiences of millions was just one unforgettable example. And, in the US today, the Major League Baseball Players Association has denounced Arizona’s racist new law which gives police draconian powers to stop any “authorised alien”.

Today, when communications involve millions of people who had hitherto been excluded, sport provides an example of how people can come together in ways that are both peaceful and thrilling. The rise and rise of talented football players from some of the poorest and smallest nations of the world are examples of what talent, training and the desire to succeed can do. In the US, 28% of Major League baseballers were born outside the US, for example. Eleven of Germany’s World Cup squad have foreign backgrounds. The world of athletics also provides inspiring examples, like the legendary Kenyan long-distance runners.

As one fan wrote in response to Eagleton’s rant:
“Nonsense. International cooperation is the only hope of the world; and while I find the various corporate attempts to highjack the world cup extremely boring, there can be no doubt that the world cup and football itself embody that prospect. It helps troubled kids and local communities; it gets kids learning about the value of team work - and few things in life feel as wonderful as scoring a goal. More importantly, it's just a bit of fun. Life is not always particularly easy - an hour and a half of drama is a welcome solace from the usual rubbish you have to put up with in life.”

The crisis of the England squad, symbolised by rows of empty seats at the match against Slovenia today, can ignite a debate about the future not only of football, but how sport can be freed from the prison of capitalist relations. Meanwhile, you can support A World to Win’s team playing in this Saturday’s Ctrl.Alt.Strike alternative World Cup.

Corinna Lotz
A World to Win Secretary