Showing posts with label Scottish Labour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scottish Labour. Show all posts

Monday, October 01, 2012

Midwinter sends Scottish Labour into the freezer


If you want to know what a future Labour government at Westminster might look like, the leader of the party in Scotland, Johann Lamont, has given the game away.

When Lamont finally explained what Scottish Labour stands for it turns out to be ending universal benefits, cutting apprenticeships, fewer university places, making older people pay for care and unfreezing council tax.

Apparently, it’s free bus passes and prescriptions that are to blame for 30,000 public sector job losses – not the bankers and corporations whose crisis is being imposed on ordinary people right across Europe.

Lamont puts forward the usual hoary old right-wing arguments about universal benefits helping not only the poor but also the rich who don’t need it – which misses their purposes entirely.

Universal benefits are a recognition by society as a whole that health and education should be available freely, and that at some times in their lives – when raising children or when they are older – society should offer its members extra support.

Otherwise, what is the point of society? Most of us get that, but New Labour Mark II doesn’t. Ed – “I am for a responsible capitalism” – Miliband will be giving out the same miserable message at his party’s conference this week.

Lamont has announced a review of Scottish Labour’s economic policy, led by the aptly named Professor Arthur Midwinter. He has already made up his mind, claiming 18,000 jobs in the NHS and local government have been lost to fund the council tax freeze, free prescriptions and free university tuition sustained by the Scottish National Party (SNP) government.

But he is entirely wrong. Public sector jobs have been lost because of the global economic and financial crisis. And every one of the political parties is committed to doing whatever is necessary to prop up the system responsible for it.

Some 5,000 more jobs are to go in Glasgow over the next year and 1,400 in North Lanarkshire. More job losses will be announced elsewhere. Unemployment is 220,000 or 8%, and rising for those aged between 25 and 49.  Many young people do not show up in the figures because they are on job schemes or college courses that will not lead to a permanent job.

In two years, Scotland’s budget has been cut by 7% or £2.1 billion, and by 2016-17 it will be 17%, or £5.3bn, less than it was in 2010-11.

Is Lamont really claiming that ending universal benefits will bring an end to cuts and unemployment? Does she think we’re stupid or what?

The reality is that if they were removed tomorrow, the savings would not transfer to other services, but be swallowed up by the deficit. If you want to know what is coming, just look at Spain, Greece, Portugal and Ireland.

Lamont accuses the SNP of “trying to find the question to which independence is the answer”. But if the fundamental question facing Scotland is the social and economic future of its people, then Labour has no answers.

“We need to say what we want Scotland to be, what we can realistically afford, and how can we, in reality, make Scotland better,” she says.

And that’s the conundrum – what we can afford whilst still propping up this disastrous capitalist system cannot support communities to become healthy, better off and well educated.

There have been calls since Lamont’s speech for the creation of a breakaway independent Labour Party but that can’t help us (it was tried in the 1970s and failed miserably).

Operating within the current parliamentary system, whether in Edinburgh or Westminster,  means we can only ever have what the system chooses to give us – so it is the system itself we need to challenge.

We need to prepare ourselves for a leap to a new political framework, where democratic People’s Assemblies in every part of the country agree creative, not-for-profit, community-based solutions that openly challenge the existing powers.   

Penny Cole

Monday, August 04, 2008

Beyond New Labour's civil war

The thing about the civil war that is now consuming New Labour is that it is absolutely impossible to take sides. For not even the most powerful microscope in the world would reveal a microbe of a principle in any camp.

On the one side there are the Brownites, whose protagonist is congenitally incapable of leadership or clarity. His policies shaped the first decade of New Labour, with its mixture of privatisation, unworkable means-tested benefits, rising inequality and worship of global markets.

On the other side are the Blairites, who brought us privatisation, the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, the “war on terror”, rising inequality and worship of global markets. They oppose Brown because he is not Blair and want more extreme pro-market policies. Having watched Brown plot against Blair, they are giving him the same treatment.

And yet these are the people who daily promote “choice” as the way forward! And if there is to be a leadership contest, both sides will no doubt unite to prevent John McDonnell, the lone left-wing voice, from getting on the ballot as they did last year.

The background to the crisis is, of course, the fact that former loyal supporters and the electorate in general, have rumbled New Labour for what it is and the party is facing oblivion. That was the message from Glasgow East, where some of the people most left behind by New Labour turned in despair to the nationalists.

Blair/Brownism is Thatcherism by another name, only deeper and much more dishonest. New Labour has gone where the Tories did not dare in NHS privatisation, the break-up of comprehensive education, attacks on benefits, witch-hunting of asylum seekers, student fees, post office closures and the elimination of human rights.

No amount of leadership changes or revamped policies can disguise this agenda, which has gone a long way to creating a market state in place of the welfare state that, ironically, Labour in its previous incarnation established after World War II. Nor is all this simply the result of policy “mistakes” but is the reflection in politics of the deeper process of corporate-driven globalisation which has eliminated the basis of reformist politics.

New Labour’s demise is truly the end of an era in British politics and if you doubt that, just look at what is happening in Scotland. Brown is nominally the leader of the party in Scotland as well as England. But you wouldn’t think so, judging by the battle to become New Labour’s leader in the Scottish parliament.

Tom McCabe, a former minister, yesterday called for the next leader to have "complete control" of the Scottish party, including Labour's MPs at Westminster. Adopting policies promoted by the Scottish National Party, McCabe said council tax should be abolished and the Edinburgh parliament be given tax-raising powers.

McCabe added: "For too long, there have been Scottish Labour politicians at local government level and at Westminster who have been resentful, and even contemptuous, of the Scottish Parliament. That behaviour needs to stop now." What McCabe is proposing would end Labour’s historic form as a unified party covering England, Scotland and Wales.

As to the leadership contest itself, bitter in-fighting has erupted between the three candidates’ rival camps. A senior member of the Andy Kerr team launched an attack on Cathy Jamieson, dismissing her as a left-wing “cave woman”. Nice.

While the break-up of New Labour is not a time for weeping, it provides a unique opportunity for discussion about how the aspirations of the disenfranchised majority can be reflected in new political forms. Added urgency is given by the onset of recession, combined with soaring utility bills and a housing crisis.

Some unions like the RMT transport workers and the firefighters in the FBU are no longer affiliated to New Labour but are opposed to the Tories coming back. These unions have an obligation to get together with John McDonnell and others and organise this debate now.

Paul Feldman
AWTW communications editor